by David A. Lax and James K. Sebenius
Pick any ten negotiations. Money probably takes center stage in most of them. Whether the discussion is about selling a division, starting a relationship with a supplier, or accepting a new job, money is the motivating force.
But money isn’t everything, especially in complicated negotiations. To maintain a productive climate in your negotiations, you may need to aggressively reframe them away from that pure price focus, in favor of a fuller package of interests.
This broader view is part of what sets 3D Negotiation™ apart from the standard negotiation tactics with which most people are familiar. That relentless tug toward a “pure” price negotiation is a pitfall you can avoid by emphasizing the design and setup of your deal as much as the tactics you’ll use when you get to the negotiating table.
Think Out of the Money Box
How do you take money out of the spotlight? Here’s an example: “I understand that you want to reduce costs of operation, and that the prices we charge you are important. We will respond to you on pricing. As we’ve discussed, price is only one part of what gives you a competitive advantage relative to your competitors and we believe that we should focus not on price alone but on how we can help you maintain and strengthen your overall competitive position.”
If you’ve done a good job of understanding the other side’s interests and situation—both from a business standpoint and from the personal standpoint of the individuals with whom you are negotiating—you can probably steer the conversation toward proposals that solve broader problems for your counterpart, rather than just reducing prices.
What if you can’t? Then it’s time to look for a way to appeal to the other side’s stated interests, while still meeting your own.
A Profitable Shift in Focus
One of our clients—an engineering-oriented company, whose products include all the bells and whistles that its engineers could pack in—was losing ground to several Chinese firms that had begun offering a stripped-down version of its product for a fraction of our client’s price.
In negotiations with its customers, our client tried to explain that, as the customer grew, it would need to buy many more of the Chinese products. Because of the extra features, the customer would have to buy far fewer of our client’s products to get the same functionality. This would mean lower total overall costs. The Procurement VP, who was clearly rewarded on minimizing total current outlay and not on lowering total lifetime outlay, continually demanded that our client match that low Chinese price, and didn’t want to budge from that position.
In response, we advised our client to deactivate all the advanced features in their product, and sell it as a “stripped-down model” at very low margin that would be cost-competitive with the Chinese models. When the customer grew and needed to expand its network, it would then have to purchase those advanced features. They would have to negotiate to get access to them—at more attractive margins. But, at that point, purchasing these additional features even at high margins would be better than its no-deal option of purchasing another slew of the Chinese products.
In other words, our client turned the Procurement VP’s price-focused tactics against him by meeting his customer’s interests of minimizing current cash outlays—while securing a higher-margin growth path for the long term. Our client followed this strategy with a number of customers, simultaneously increasing margins while becoming the market share leader in its product category.
By not getting bogged down by price, our client reframed the deal and ended up in a more profitable situation than if he would have otherwise.
David A. Lax and James K. Sebenius are the authors of 3D Negotiation – Powerful Tools to Change the Game in Your Most Important Deals (Harvard Business School Press, September 2006). For more information see their book website www.3dnegotiation.com and their business website www.negotiate.com.
Adapted with permission from Harvard Business School Press from 3-D Negotiation: Powerful Tools to Change the Game in Your Most Important Deals by David A. Lax and James K. Sebenius. Copyright 2006 David A. Lax and James K. Sebenius. All Rights Reserved.
Some links for your own research
|up ń||back to publications - Career||back to themanager.org|
If you have questions or comments to our website, do not hesitate
to contact us (comments and questions are always welcomed):
webmaster2 AT reckliesmp.de
Copyright © 2001 Recklies Management Project GmbH
Status: 18. Januar 2008