![]() |
|
| themanager.org | Search |
Negotiations will not produce the
desired effect unless those involved consciously address both the solid facts
and the human dimension. Communication can be described as an exchange of what
we might call „messages“, and it has been found that such „messages“ have both
a factual and an interpersonal dimension. It is the interpersonal dimension
that governs the factual one in human communication. A good negotiator is not
like a computer full of technical data. You should always make people feel that
the conversation you are having is an exchange among human beings.
If your negotiation runs smoothly it
is not likely to be due to the fact that you have always dogmatically observed
an ideal behavior model or method. If you want continuing success in the way
you are dealing with others, you should thoroughly explore your own individual
character. In doing so, you must admit to your negative as well as your
positive character traits. A profile of social competence includes both ups and
downs.
|
Know thyself -
otherwise you will not be able to learn the art of winning somebody
over and convincing them of your ideas. |

One important step towards fruitful cooperation
is developing the ability to swiftly adapt to change. This requires a sound
awareness of the impact of one’s own behaviors or patterns of behavior on
others and the reaction it might trigger. It is therefore crucial to have a
thorough knowledge of one’s own personality structure. There are tests that
help you to recognize your most important character traits. However, you can do
without such tests to the extent that you take in and process information, that
you receive from others - for example in the form of feedback - without
immediately questioning it.
Human beings have to satisfy their
basic needs. At the same time - and the older they get - human beings strive
for self-actualization.
The psychologist Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
offered the hypothesis that only very few human beings are capable of
self-actualization. This is why he undertook to explore what self-actualization
is and how humans achieve it. In doing so he devised a hierarchy of motives and
represented it in the form of a pyramid with five levels. The model has become
known to experts and the interested public as „Maslow’s Pyramid of Needs“.
|
|

The special aspect of this model is that Maslow
found that once a need is gratified, it does no longer measurably influence the
behavior of human beings. He also identified a certain ranking of human needs.
The need for safety, for example, becomes relevant only once our physiological
needs are sufficiently satisfied. Our desire for esteem becomes obvious only
once our belongingness needs are fulfilled etc.
Self-actualization: Fulfilling an individual goal in
life, creative activity, maximize one’s personal potential or talent.
Esteem Needs: Striving for power, competence,
independence, prestige, recognition, respect.
Belongingness : Belonging to a social group, human
interaction, affection, friendship.
Safety and Security: Social security, economic
security, protection against hazards, structure and order.
Physiological needs: Satisfaction of fundamental life or
death needs like food, water, shelter and sleep.
What that means for conversation is that you
will not be able to win somebody over unless you manage to uncover those
internal needs which they think they have not sufficiently satisfied and which
are thus still motivating. In most negotiations you can achieve this by
focusing on the two dominant levels of belongingness
needs and esteem. Since these are
values based on experience, it is by their nature that they differ in weight
from person to person and from society to society.
However, it cannot be denied that our deepest
yearning is for affection and recognition. Therefore, you can be successful in
negotiations to the extent to which you manage to satisfy your opposite
number’s „hunger“ in precisely these
aspects.
Security can be a motivating factor
once it is endangered or not yet there. Self-actualization cannot serve as
motivator unless you have the chance to fulfill a person’s ultimate goal in
life.
... and you will hold the key to
their personality in your hand! Everybody knows that human beings are never
alike. Nevertheless we are still frequently surprised by other people’s
reactions, once they do not act the way we hoped or expected they would. It
happens time and again that we judge other people’s behavior on the basis of
how we „tick“ ourselves. However: What we prefer might be unbearable for
others. We should appreciate that.
According to Fritz Riemann (1975) we
can observe four fundamental and basically opposed orientations in human
beings. All four orientations can be identified in each human being, but to
various extents. However, most of the time one or two of these orientations are
predominant.
Those looking for human closeness: The following issues and feelings are of
particular importance to these people: Feeling close to others, commitment,
affection, trust, sympathy, kindness, comfort, tenderness and harmony. They
need warmth, affirmation and they are altruistic up to self-renunciation, they
are active in the social field, they are able to identify with others and might
even forget about themselves. They mix easily, they easily blend in with teams,
are corrective, accepting and understanding. However, they have a tendency to
be over-dependent because they dislike to be alone, they might have a victim’s
mentality and are inhibited in their aggression.
Those who are aloof need exactly the opposite in order to feel comfortable. Boundaries,
non-interchangeability, freedom, individuality, self-sufficiency, rational
thinking and behavior (feelings? No way!). They do not want to be controlled.
They seek distance and seem not to need anyone near them. They often seem cool
and unapproachable. Reason is what counts for them. Even if it seems almost
paradox: Only to the extent that they are offered a high degree of freedom and
chances for withdrawal in human interaction will they give in to feelings and
enjoy closeness. Help from others is something rather unpleasant to them and
they often seem afraid of committing themselves and/or appear uneasy when it
comes to emotions.
Those looking for constancy need reliability, punctuality, economicalness,
determination, responsibility, planning, cautiousness, control, aims, laws,
continuity, necessity, consistency, faithfulness, principles, rules, analyses,
stability, obligation, endurance, consequences. Constant people are very
reliable, systematic, thorough, orderly, they are excellent organizers and true
to their principles. However, they tend to be boring, inflexible, pedantic and
stubborn.
Those looking for change - as opposed to the constant ones - like everything that is new, they
like capriciousness. Everything in the context of passion, attraction, euphoria
and imagination is meaningful to them. In human interaction they look for
pleasure, charm, creativity, vivacity, suggestion, spontaneity, risk, fantasy,
drama and desire. They have curiosity, they like to be seeking and searching,
learning and living.
However, they can also be unreliable, chaotic,
histrionic, self-centered, chatty and unsystematic.
|
|

These fundamental orientations can be mapped on
a coordinate system called the Riemann/Thomann model with a space and a time
axis. The time axis is vertical with the two extremes constancy and change.
Space is represented in the horizontal axis with the two extremes distance and
closeness. Space and time are the criteria upon which people differ in their
interaction.
Humans do not only have one
orientation but a mixture of all of them - with a certain center of gravity. A
person could possibly have a combination of 70% closeness and 30% distance. On
the time axis there might be 40% constancy and 60% change. Collectively they
form the overall picture of this person’s „home ground“
This „home ground“ has a certain
center which we might call the „personality gravity center“. It is extremely
difficult to determine one’s own orientation, because from our own perspective
we are only able to experience the result of their combination in the form of
our behavior in certain situations. When trying to classify yourself, bear in
mind that there is no „good“ or „bad“ but merely „equal“.
When analyzing human behavior, do
not forget that your judgment will inevitably be inadequate because of the
infinite diversity of behaviors and because your judgment will always be
determined by personal desires. Thus, effectively influencing others will only
be possible in certain areas and it will never be 100%. With this awareness of
fundamental needs and motives you possess a useful and practical set of instruments
which helps you to learn to understand how others „tick“. You will now be able
to accept actions and reactions of others with much more calmness. It will be
easier for you to gratify their instant needs and this gives you a crucial
advantage in negotiations.
Practical hints for negotiations and
successful interaction with other people:
Avoid situations where both parties want (or are bent) to win by making
sure in advance that there is a conducive atmosphere for the conversation.
Do not pretend, be the way you are, not the way you want to be seen.
Otherwise you will not appear natural which will make it hard to build up
affinity. Authenticity is the key.
Be critical with yourself. Be true to yourself and your character.
Reflect yourself and do not live a superficial life. You will thus be able to
develop a sensitivity for what is going on around you.
Accept that human beings are self-centered by nature. This helps you to
respect opinions and feelings of others.
Approach other people with a receptive and open mind. Reduce obstacles
by putting yourself in their position when there is disagreement.
Avoid judging the opinions of others, accept them as suggestions.
Start your conversation with something positive. Then, however, get
straight to the point and the intended purpose of the conversation.
Let others know right from the beginning that they can benefit from this
negotiation by describing the positive results to them.
Do not insist on your individual plans but demonstrate that you are
sincerely interested in a solution that meets the expectations of both sides.
Make concessions in some areas. However, find out in advance to what
extent such concessions could compromise your goals.
Listen closely and, by asking questions on what others are saying, show
them what you have learnt from their comments or objections.
Frequently, disagreement in
conversations leads to tension on the interpersonal level. Recognizing such
conflicts while they are emerging will enable you to make an intervention and
to ultimately succeed in the negotiation.
In order to avoid ending up in an
emotional „conversation bottleneck“, you should keep an eye on the
communicative behavior of the other person. He or she will unconsciously inform
you, whether they are happy with the course of the conversation or not.
If you want to remain in control in
a conversation, you must avoid being unconsciously influenced by their
communication behavior. Be aware of their tone of voice, expression and body
language.
The following list names but a few
examples of communication behavior from a very broad and diverse range. These
are frequent ones, however, and therefore you should pay special attention to
them. Test out thoroughly, in which of the cases your reaction would be
appropriate or where you could correct your patterns of communication behavior.
Rude, impolite: Remain polite but determined. Ignore gaffes made by others.
Nervous, impatient: Stay calm. React quickly. Do not try to calm them down, it might easily
make them aggressive.
Cumbersome, thoughtful: Do not insist, explain thoroughly. Give them time to think.
Cool, polite:
Give them a feeling of esteem, ask them for their opinion, restrain yourself.
Kind, open for contact: Make use of a conducive negotiation situation, but do not become too
intimate.
Quiet, hesitant: Use question and pause techniques, but avoid a questioning situation,
do not silence them with a flood of words.
Critical, suspicious: Work with proven facts, use a good rationale, check whether they are
still with you from time to time.
Talkative, chatty: Interrupt in a friendly way, do not become impatient, try to puzzle
them.
Insecure, indecisive: Do not insist, give detailed
explanations of advantages and benefits, take the initiative.
Arrogant, boastful: Be very polite and kind, avoid opposition, pay compliments.
Pedantic, narrow-minded: Immediately correct everything that has remained unclear, be careful
with compliments, take these people very seriously.
That is all very well in theory -
you might say - and: yes, it requires frequent and active use in day-to-day
situations. This means: practice, practice, practice. Communication can be
trained. Continue enlarging your store of knowledge from experience. Enhance
your personality in the interaction with others. Avoid dogmatic methods and
keep away from manipulative conversation techniques. Those who know how to
convince others do not need manipulation. Those who have the art of motivating
others are certain to be successful in
negotiations and conversations.
Wishing you a lot of fun and
success.
Sincerely, Karl Heinz Lorenz
The
Author:
Karl Heinz Lorenz, 38, graduated in Business
Administration from Mannheim Berufsakademie in 1988 and is one of two partners
in LORENZ-SEMINARE Personality- & Competence-Training, Munich.
For
further information contact:
Tel +49 (0)89.95820056
Fax +49 (0)89.95820057
E-mail khl@lorenz-seminare.de
©
LORENZ-SEMINARE, Munich